Wednesday, March 31, 2010
One of the most prominent accounts I encounter with our clients daily is insurance. Whether it covers bereavement, health, profession, fixed assets, or third party indemnities, each warrants the beneficiaries with assistance beyond some emerging contingencies in life. Too many to enumerate, I just noticed that there’s none to contain certain policy for employment.
As competence is crowned on each aspiring head, the effort to climb the apex of success gets too tough to wield. I was stuck last week when informed about the abrupt halt of one of the firm’s departments. “The decision was purely strategic,” the management claimed. If performance is never the issue why someone could possibly lose a job, what else would assure him of a stable feeding plate tomorrow? If a company holds its workers accountable to the benefits it caters, should not every employer in the same way be subjected to employees’ bond?
Per se, employment insurance is not really prevalent. I wonder why.
As competence is crowned on each aspiring head, the effort to climb the apex of success gets too tough to wield. I was stuck last week when informed about the abrupt halt of one of the firm’s departments. “The decision was purely strategic,” the management claimed. If performance is never the issue why someone could possibly lose a job, what else would assure him of a stable feeding plate tomorrow? If a company holds its workers accountable to the benefits it caters, should not every employer in the same way be subjected to employees’ bond?
Per se, employment insurance is not really prevalent. I wonder why.
Posted in: workopolis
0 comments:
Post a Comment